Scheuerell et al 2006: Temperature and Chinook Egg-to-Fry
         mbayly
      
      
     View all records in the stressor response library  
          
        
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
      
    
          
        
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
      
    
          
    
  
  
          
        
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
      
    
          
        
      
    
  
  
    
      
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
    
  
  
          
        
      
    
          
        
      
    
  
  
          
        
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
      
    
          
        
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
      
    
  
  
    
      
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
  
    
  
      
    
 
    
  
  
    
      
  
    
  
      
  
    
    
 
    
  
  
Species Common Name
              Chinook Salmon
          Latin Name (Genus species)
              Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
          Stressor Name
              Temperature
          Specific Stressor Metric
              Mean Daily Temp During Incubation
          Stressor Units
              C
          Vital Rate (Process)
              Survivorship
          Geography
              Oregon
          Detailed SR Function Description
              Function applied in Honea et al., (2009) and Scheuerell et al. (2006) for life cycle model for wild spring-run Chinook salmon. Survivorship function from Scheuerell et al. (2006):
Probability of egg-to-fry survivorship based on stream temperature where Tinc is the mean daily temp during incubation (Aug-May for their population):
Tinc >= 1.3 & Tinc < 4.7: ((0.273*Tinc)-0.342)
Tinc >= 4.7 & Tinc < 14.3: 0.94
Tinc >= 14.3 & Tinc < 18.1: ((-0.245*Tinc)+4.44)
Tinc >= 18.1: 0.01
          Probability of egg-to-fry survivorship based on stream temperature where Tinc is the mean daily temp during incubation (Aug-May for their population):
Tinc >= 1.3 & Tinc < 4.7: ((0.273*Tinc)-0.342)
Tinc >= 4.7 & Tinc < 14.3: 0.94
Tinc >= 14.3 & Tinc < 18.1: ((-0.245*Tinc)+4.44)
Tinc >= 18.1: 0.01
Function Type
              continuous
          Stressor Scale
              linear
          References Cited
              Scheuerell M.D., Hilborn R., Ruckelshaus M.H., Bartz K.K., Lagueux K.M., Haas A.D. & Rawson K. (2006) The Shiraz model: a tool for incorporating anthropogenic effects and fish-habitat relationships in conservation planning. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 63, 1596–1607.
Honea, J. M., Jorgensen, J. C., McCLURE, M. M., Cooney, T. D., Engie, K., Holzer, D. M., & Hilborn, R. (2009). Evaluating habitat effects on population status: influence of habitat restoration on spring‐run Chinook salmon. Freshwater Biology, 54(7), 1576-1592.
          Honea, J. M., Jorgensen, J. C., McCLURE, M. M., Cooney, T. D., Engie, K., Holzer, D. M., & Hilborn, R. (2009). Evaluating habitat effects on population status: influence of habitat restoration on spring‐run Chinook salmon. Freshwater Biology, 54(7), 1576-1592.
Stressor Response csv data
              temp_egg.csv
  (368 bytes)
  
  
      
      
          | Raw Stressor Values | Scaled Response Values 0 to 100 | SD | low.limit | up.limit | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 1.3 | 1.29 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 2 | 20.4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 3 | 47.7 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 4 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 4.7 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 6 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 6 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 8 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 10 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 12 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 14 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 14.3 | 93.65 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 15 | 76.5 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 16 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 17 | 27.5 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 18.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 
Stressor Response Chart
